Q: Can you explain the significance of the US Attorney
agreeing to present your petition (specifically any legal significance)?
A: Because federal law (18 U.S.C. Section 3332) requires the
U.S. Attorney to present to a Special Grand Jury information submitted
by citizens regarding the commission of a federal crime, the U.S.
Attorney’s agreement to comply with this statute in our case is more
significant politically and in terms of the public interest than in
terms of establishing new legal precedent.
Q: If the US Attorney believed that your case had little or
no merit, could he simply reject the petition outright?
A: No, as noted above, federal law (18 U.S.C. Section 3332)
requires the U.S. Attorney to present to a Special Grand Jury
information submitted by citizens regarding the commission of a federal
crime. This is a mandatory duty. The U.S. Attorney had no discretion to
reject the petition.
Q: Can you provide a timetable regarding how proceedings
will move forward?
A: The law does not set a schedule for how quickly the U.S.
Attorney or the Special Grand Jury must act. Special Grand Juries are
empaneled for 18 months typically and their term may be extended. Given
the seriousness of the matter, we would hope and expect action within a
few months (not years).
Q: When will the evidence be presented to the grand jury?
A: The Lawyers’ Committee has offered to the U.S. Attorney
to present its evidence directly to the Special Grand Jury. We do not
yet know whether the U.S. Attorney will accept this offer. If our offer
is not accepted, the U.S. Attorney will have the obligation to present
our evidence in our Petition to the Special Grand Jury and may or may
not announce a time frame for doing so.
Q: Are there any remaining hurdles before this happens?
A: To our knowledge, the U.S. Attorney is free to start a
presentation of our evidence to the Special Grand Jury and may have
already initiated this process. The law prohibits a U.S. Attorney from
disclosing the proceedings that occur before a federal grand jury absent
a court order allowing such disclosure in special circumstances.
Q: Are we talking weeks, months — maybe longer?
A: We cannot answer this question with any more precision than
stated above.
Q: If you had to make your case using just three pieces of
evidence/information, what would they be?
A: If you have read our entire Petition, you understand that
there are about 20 categories of relevant evidence, and some categories
have numerous pieces of evidence or examples in the category. We are not
required to limit the evidence on which we rely and we do not choose to
do so here. Some of the most compelling evidence in our Petition from a
lay person’s perspective would likely include the testimony of
numerous First Responders who reported the sights and sounds of
explosions at the WTC on 9/11, the finding of high-tech explosives and
incendiaries residue in the WTC dust via chemical laboratory testing and
analysis; and the fact that to the naked eye the collapses of
WTC1, WTC2, and WTC7 all exhibit the characteristics of a controlled
demolition, as explained by the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth in
testimony presented to the Lawyers’ Committee in New York in a public
event in September of 2016.
Q: How would you explain your case in brief, layman’s terms?
A: If you see a bird on the lakeside and it walks like a duck
and quacks like a duck, it is likely a duck. First Responders saw and
heard, and reported, the sights and sounds of explosions at the WTC on
9/11. Chemical testing of the WTC dust shows the presence of high-tech
explosives and incendiaries. Videos of the collapse of WTC1, WTC2, and
WTC7 show for all to see to this day the characteristics of a
controlled demolition. The obvious conclusion from these key categories
of evidence is corroborated by numerous other categories of scientific
and technical evidence described in the Petition. The emperor (the
official story that the WTC buildings collapsed due to fires from the
aircraft attacks) has no clothes. As Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s
character, consulting detective Sherlock Holmes, is famous for stating,
when one has eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however
improbable, must be the truth. The complete collapse of these three WTC
buildings on 9/11 was caused by the use of pre-planted explosives and
incendiaries. No other theory fits all of the available evidence.