The Lawyers' Committee for 9/II Inquiry

8 MAY 20-Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss

8 MAY 20-PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

In their opposition (“Plaintiffs’ Opposition” or “Pl. Opp.”), Plaintiffs fail to overcome the fundamental defects in their claims identified in Defendants’ memorandum of law in support of their motion to dismiss (“Motion to Dismiss” or “Defs. Mem.”). Plaintiffs seek to have the United
States Attorney’s Office (“USAO”) present their “Amended Petition,” which claims to set forth evidence that explosives were used to destroy the World Trade Center on 9/11, to a grand jury, and Plaintiffs further seek the resulting grand jury materials. To the extent the USAO has not presented the Amended Petition to a grand jury, Plaintiffs do not have a basis to compel it to do so, and they do not have a right to any grand jury materials.

DOJ Reply Memo on Motion to Dismiss LC et al NY fed mandamus case 050820

We are Worldwide

Donate

We are a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization so donations are tax deductible

Stay Informed!

REGISTER FOR UPDATES

Your Lawyers’ Committee will keep you up to speed on all the most important 9/11 legal actions. We respect your privacy, no spam. Unsubscribe at any time.
Blank Form (#3)

Inquiries

Submit questions or comments through our CONTACT FORM

WTC 7 Collapsed Due To Fire?

NIST.gov says WTC 7 collapsed in ~7 seconds because office fires caused thermal expansion in a girder. Click here for the official FAQ.

Visit our Store!

Follow & Share!